Monday, May 28, 2012

Chapel Hill Mayor Mark Kleinschmidt: Why You Shouldn?t Boycott North Carolina

The mayor of Chapel Hill, Mark Kleinschmidt (who is openly gay), was confident that his town would turn back Amendment One on May 8. It did, by a whopping 86 percent to 14 percent, but he watched as we all did here as county after rural county results came in, with more voters turning out on the side of bigotry and ignorance that evening. Many called for a boycott of the state as a result of the 21 point defeat at the polls. Kleinschmidt took to Huff Post to make the case for why people should not economically abandon the state.

While I had hoped that we would been the first state in the country to defeat a marriage amendment, I remain extremely proud to have stood with an extraordinary group of activists, elected officials, businesses, and families who worked diligently against it these last eight months. When your amendments passed, we cried with you. When your marriage laws were enacted, we celebrated with you. Now, while North Carolina?s LGBT community is suffering from this difficult loss, we deserve the same support and solidarity we provided you; we do not deserve your enmity.

Across North Carolina, our cities, our centers of higher education, and our mountain and Outer Banks vacation destinations all rejected this amendment.

And he?s right. The counties where many of you spend your hard-earned money if you come to North Carolina are the ones that turned it back solidly:?Buncombe, Chatham, Dare, Durham, Mecklenburg, Orange, Wake, and Watauga.

These counties include the cities of Asheville, Pittsboro, Cape Hatteras, Durham, Charlotte, Chapel Hill, Raleigh, and Boone. These eight counties represent about 28 percent of the state?s population and are centers of education, the arts, business innovation, technology, and tourism. Even in counties where the amendment passed, like Guilford, New Hanover, and Forsyth, their county seats ? Greensboro, Wilmington, and Winston-Salem ? soundly defeated it. Now, more than ever, the North Carolina LGBT community needs to know from you that the work we?ve done fighting this amendment and creating these wonderful places is acknowledged by our friends from elsewhere.

When I interviewed Mark back in 2009, he explained why North Carolina is different from many Southern states, particularly in regards to race relations and civil rights:

I talk about how North Carolina is different than what a lot of people believe is true about the South. I don?t defend Georgia, Mississippi, and Alabama and South Carolina, but we aren?t any of those places. We never have been. As the South moved into the ?50s, ?60s, and civil rights issues began to dominate the American culture, North Carolina was one of the leading states in helping move it forward. We had leaders that had already come of age with progressive values helping to move the state, like Frank Porter Graham, Terry Sanford. And none of them did everything that we would have liked them to have done, but we made enormous progress in ways the states outside of the South only wish they could have made.

While they further segregated themselves, our state has taken up the difficult challenge of true integration. And I think we are constantly self-acknowledging that we have not always been successful; it?s a continuous process ? and this is a state that gives birth to that kind of politics, and we should be proud of it. People need to reevaluate what they think of North Carolina. It?s not a surprise to me that North Carolina had the first openly gay elected official [in the South - Joe Herzenberg, elected to the Chapel Hill town council in 1987]. Other states don?t share that with Chapel Hill. There are very few places like this.

And the coalition building that occurred during the battle to defeat Amendment One was multi-racial, multi-faith and notably more true vision of progressive leadership that should be lauded ? the NC NAACP was only the second chapter in the country to come out against a marriage discrimination amendment (the other was California?s). And the results of that work over the years showed in the May vote. As journalist Barry Yeoman pointed out:

Voters in majority-black precincts rejected the measure: Charlotte (52 percent), Raleigh (51 percent), Greensboro (54 percent), Winston-Salem (55 percent), and Durham (65 percent). Durham?s results were dramatic: Not a single majority-black precinct supported the amendment. Several crushed it by margins of 3-to-1 and even 4-to-1.

So Mark Kleinschmidt?s point of view ? that to boycott North Carolina is to punish those working for positive change, is based on the desire to continue the progress being made ? and your help is needed:

Our LGBT community wants what everyone wants: equal protection under the law. Without protections, our rights to visit our loved ones in the hospital, protect our children, and manage our personal assets are at risk, and in some cases have led to suffering and traumatic outcomes. We need your support to convince the rest of North Carolina that these issues are important and that equality is the only solution.

What is my take??I can easily see Mayor Kleinschmidt?s point-of-view ? I live in Durham, where many private businesses and institutions have same-sex spousal equivalent benefits and employment non-discrimination protections. They need to offer them to be competitive; the state is behind the curve on this and will see the mistake of this amendment in short order regardless when it comes to recruiting and retaining talent. What the amendment won?t do is put any of who do have the protections back in the closet.

However, I do understand why people would want to keep their hard-earned cash out of ?NC. If so, folks need to remember to keep wallets closed regarding ALL states with an amendment ? ?over 30 promote discrimination in this manner ? so that?s a lot of territory to avoid. If you do choose to boycott, keep a handy list of all of the states not to do business with ? online and offline ? and make sure to be diligent and consistent.?Here you go:

List of U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions by type

horsetail falls ice t downton abbey new york knicks president day lin j.r. smith

Streaming with Apple TV

Vote!

Excerpt from: Streaming with Apple TV

Apple's slick interface and the iTunes Store make Apple TV a great way to stream movies, music and more....

read more...

Published By: Barron's Online - Today


blog comments powered by
  • Currently no related articles

cadillac xts rambus rambus pabst blue ribbon pabst blue ribbon mac miller omarion

Hammon to play for Russia again in London Olympics

Hammon to play for Russia again in London Olympics
Becky Hammon to play for Russian women's basketball team in London Olympics
By The Associated Press

UNCASVILLE, Conn. (AP) ' Becky Hammon hopes that the Olympics will be a little less stressful for her.

Hammon will once again play for the Russian women's basketball team at the games this summer in London. She created a stir in 2008 when she first played for Russia in the Beijing Olympics. She helped guide that team to a bronze medal.

"It's old news," Hammon about her decision to play for Russia. "I played with them in the world championship, European championship, hopefully I'll enjoy it a lot more. By far it was one of the best decisions I ever made and I stand by that, and really look forward to doing it again."



When Hammon, who was raised in South Dakota and played to Colorado State, initially decided to play for Russia in 2008 it ignited a media firestorm with people questioning her patriotism, including 2008 U.S. Olympic coach Anne Donovan.

Every time Hammon went on the road with the San Antonio Silver Stars she had reporters waiting to talk to her about her decision to play for Russia.

It got to be a bit much.

"I had reporters from all over the world asking me questions," Hammon said. "Everywhere I went that's all anyone wanted to talk about. It's nice that this time people seem to be focused on other things. It seems almost every team now has one or two players with foreign passports playing for them. It goes back to the whole 'it's Russia'. If it was a country no one heard of, no one really would have cared. That's the society we live in."

Now no one seems to notice anymore.

"It's played through once," Silver Stars coach Dan Hughes said. "The reality of it is we've been through it one time already and Becky is an example of what I think a lot of teams that the U.S. will face. There are a lot of players in our league that are now on other teams and going to be part of the Olympic experience."

The 35-year-old point guard plays for a Russian club team during the winter and became a naturalized citizen. Because she hadn't played for the United States in any major FIBA-sanctioned international events, she was allowed to compete for Russia in the Beijing Olympics.

While Hammon is happy that the firestorm seems to have died down this time around, she also is proud that her Russian has improved over the past few years.

"I understand a little bit, it's a lot better than 2008, put it that way," she said laughing.

While Hammon had to miss a few games for the Silver Stars in the past to train with Russia, she won't join the national team until the WNBA takes its month-long break in the middle of July.

"I won't be missing any Silver Stars games and that's important to me," Hammon said.

Hammon is excited to once again march in the opening ceremonies and take part in the games.

"It's the Olympics, it should be fun a great time I think. It will be my first time in London for any length of time," Hammon said. "I'm looking forward to be in London. Get back together with the girls from the team, hopefully make a great run."

One player that Hammon won't be playing with this time around is center Maria Stepanova. The 6-foot-8 star, who has played in the last four Olympics, tore her anterior cruciate ligament at the Euroleague final eight in late March.

"She's been the face of the franchise, so that's a tough loss for us," Hammon said. "There's some young kids that are very talented post players coming up, too. Someone of her caliber you're going to miss, no way around that. But it's also another opportunity for someone else to step up and prove that they belong at the highest level."

She hopes that even without Stepanova, the Russians can make another run at a medal. They are in the same pool as Australia and wouldn't have to face the heavily-favored U.S. team until the elimination rounds.

"At the end of the day it's been a really cool journey and unique journey no one has ever done," she said.

Page: 1

Source:Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.. All Rights Reserved

gonzaga rosie o donnell soda bread recipe vanderbilt evan mathis staff sgt. robert bales jason russell

New TV spot: Nice try, Walker, but Wisconsin's still dead last in jobs

The page you requested is temporarily unavailable.

The site is currently under maintenance.

We're redirecting you to the homepage in 5 seconds.

(Error 403 You are banned from this site. Please contact via a different client configuration if you believe that this is a mistake.)

peyton manning rupaul drag race walking dead comic kratom broncos broncos lehigh

Premier Online Community

A premier online community may be difficult to describe, since this phrase appears to be a self-proclaimed description of a number of different websites where people get together to discuss common interests. The idea of Internet communities has actually been around for a long time, yet its potential and its popularity has not really been fully realized until the recent phenomenon known as the social networking craze surfaced. With the advent of such websites as Facebook and MySpace and many others that followed in their wake, people have discovered the power of gathering people who have an expressed interest in a particular issue or activity. In the case of the large social networking sites, that common interest would be to meet and stay in touch with others, often for the express purpose of dating or socializing. But the power of Internet communities is now realized by the users of the World Wide Web in new and powerful ways. The ability to gather people with a common interest and perhaps purpose from around the world has never been possible as it is today , and the result has been the proliferation of millions of websites, many of them joined together by some theme. So with so many like-minded networking type websites, there will bound to be those that begin to declare themselves the premier online community for such and such a cause.

Internet communities may be made up of people who have never met one another in person, or of people who have certainly met and just want to keep in touch in spite of distance. Internet communities can be made up of very superficial contacts, or be comprised of very close knit members. These communities may be closed, allowing only membership by invitation, or they may be quite public, desirous of as many new members as possible. Internet communities may be comprised only of chat rooms and messages boards, or they may also contain blogs and the ability to instant message. Businesses have recognized the power of online communities to reach out and gain new relationships both in search of customers, but also to build affinity with like-minded business persons. So how does one decide what a premier online community really is? Here might be some ways to judge such a claim:

The most obvious claim to being a premier online community would be the size of the traffic numbers to the website. Facebook or MySpace might easily claim to be the premier online community for social networking because of the millions of visitors that they have coming to their sites every month. Their claim may have nothing to do with ease of navigating around the site or even the number of dates or new relationships the sites have created. Businesses that start an Internet networking site so customers can talk about their product, both good and bad may only use traffic numbers as their standard for success. In that vein, the claim to be the premier online community discussion website for a particular product would seem to be in order.

But many companies and non-profits or other conscious raising sites might try and control the language and the tone of discussion in their Internet social networking communities. After all, who wants to have disparaging comments about one's social issue or product or beliefs on an online networking website? But the fact is the best websites would be those that open up all discussion and welcome all comments, both supporters and dissenters. Certainly a foremost or leading online community ought to be a place where contributors enjoy an unbiased freedom to share their thoughts. Is a premier online community a place where discussion is monitored and censored is a question only the reader can decide. Can you pray this prayer? "Search me, O God and know my heart; try me and know my thoughts: and see if there be any wicked way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting." (Psalm 139: 23, 24) God loves for us to utter these words to Him when we are sincere.

The word premier means best, leading, primary or foremost and assigning such lofty descriptions to an online community may only be able to be assigned legitimately to an online community that has great influence to affect public opinion or bring about significant social change. It would seem that a premier online community could only make the claim of being the best or the leading or foremost website if it is able to affect or even shape society in new directions. For example, if an online community that is dedicated to bringing together scientists, politicians, and grassroots leaders to influence and can even pressure Congress to enact certain legislation regarding, for example, the harnessing of wind power, then it would appear that this particular Internet community may earn the title of the best or leading Internet community for wind energy interests. The fact that the Internet is an unregulated platform for free speech enables any claim to be made, no matter whether it is true or not. Labeling something as premier doesn't necessarily make the claim true, but certainly the amount of visitors a community has, the openness of the community for all sides of a discussion and its influence on buyers, the culture and/or public policy may allow a website to make the claim of being foremost in its arena. It is up to the billion or so users of the Internet to make the final decision about a website's claims.

the chronicle spinal stenosis the forgotten man mike jones just friends chronicle lance armstrong

Mexico's Michel Franco wins Cannes sidebar prize

CANNES, France (AP) ? "After Lucia" by Mexican director Michel Franco has won the top prize in the Cannes Film Festival's sidebar competition, Un Certain Regard.

It was chosen Saturday from a slate of 20 films by a jury headed by British actor Tim Roth.

Un Certain Regard focuses on new and emerging filmmakers.

The jury gave second prize to French film "Le Grand Soir" by Benoit Delepine and Gustave Kervern, and a "special distinction" citation to Bosnian film "Djeca" ("Children of Sarajevo") by Aida Begic.

Twenty-two films from around the world are competing for prizes in the festival's main competition. Winners will be announced Sunday.

Favorites for the top prize, the Palme d'Or, include Michael Haneke's "Amour" and Christian Mungiu's "Beyond the Hills."

Associated Press

vince young vince young evan longoria mothers day 2012 cinco de mayo osama bin laden death spinal muscular atrophy

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Sony and Sharp end joint LCD venture

Sony and Sharp announced the end to a partnership formed in 2009, when Sony invested $126 million (?80 billion) in Sharp's LCD display business and received a 7 percent stake in the display manufacturer.

The deal started to go really sour when Sony announced in March that they wouldn't inject any more financing into the venture.

And, by September this year they would decide what the future of the two companies' collaboration would be.

That future turned out to be nonexistent, as Sony announced that they'll sell back their 7 percent at a full refund.

Also in March, just before the Sony/Sharp partnership went south, Sharp announced that the electronics manufacturer Foxconn would purchase a 50 percent stake in Sharp for $809.1 million (?515 billion).

The deal was said to facilitate cost-cutting on LCD screen components through bulk purchases from both companies.

Sharp will reportedly continue making large displays, while Foxconn will still stick to smaller screens.

Sony, the jilted lover?

Sony, meanwhile, under the leadership of new CEO Kaz Hirai, announced that they intend to return to profitability this year after seven straight years in the red.

To that end, Sony announced plans last month to axe 10,000 jobs in an ongoing move to reign in the company's ailing TV business. This is the third such mass exodus Sony's seen since 2005.

And just yesterday TechRadar reported that Sony (and Samsung) have begun enforcing minimum prices on televisions to deter retailers from setting competitive, but loss-making, price points.

Another, more positive rumor whispers of a partnership between Sony and Panasonic to begin producing cheaper OLED TVs.

OLED displays are notoriously expensive, but Sony and Panasonic could combine their substantial know-hows to bring that cost down and pass savings onto consumers.

Via The Verge

minnesota twins green bay packers bobby abreu 2012 draft chicago bears colt mccoy philadelphia eagles